• Home
    • Main Page
    • Principles
    • Leadership
    • Backgrounder
    • Membership
    • Donate
    • Newsletter
    • Subscribe
    • Submit Your Blog Article
    • Contact
  • OSED
    • The Innovation Framework
    • Civic Forums
    • Strategic Doing
    • Strategic Initiatives
    • Testimonials
    • FAQs
  • Connect
    • News
    • Blog
    • How To
    • Research
    • World News
    • Job Board
  • Engage
    • Abundant World Day
    • Movies
  • Store

blog

How to Frame a Conversation about Race in America

9/12/2014

2 Comments

 

President Clinton's Initiative on Race.jpg
"President Clinton's Initiative on Race" by White House Photographer - http://clinton4.nara.gov. Licensed under Public domain via Wikimedia Commons.

“In conflict you don’t bring a knife that cuts, you bring a needle that sews.” ~ African Proverb

How to Frame a Conversation about Race in America


In 1997 President Bill Clinton called for a national dialogue on race. Here we are 17 years later and it’s abundantly clear that in spite of numerous initiatives to get people talking about race in this country, we still have a long way to go. We have yet to find a workable, replicable and scalable approach where people can talk about race in order to defuse tensions and create understanding.

Ideally, such a dialogue would lead to developing a broader range of options for living into Dr. King's future where people are judged by the content of their character and not the color of their skin. 

Color Explosion. Photo © Alice Merkel
What follows are three suggestions for framing a conversation on race which might ease the way toward creating those better options for our collective future. These suggestions are for people who are willing to self-reflect and look deeply at the role that racism plays in their lives. Those who’ve convinced themselves that they’re “color blind” or that the problem of racism exists entirely outside of themselves will not be good candidates for the kind of dialogue I am suggesting:
1. Begin with the premise that we are all racists – at least unconsciously so.
No one escapes racism’s corrosive effects. Even when we have worked to “unlearn” racism, it still lingers beneath the surface of our awareness – hence the inclusion of the words “at least unconsciously so” in the premise. 

Three Suggestions for Framing a Conversation on Race

For more, see: One America Initiative: "On June 14, 1997, U.S. President Bill Clinton announced One America in the 21st Century: The President's Initiative on Race. This initiative, established with Executive Order 13050, was a critical element in President Clinton's effort to prepare the country to embrace diversity.[clarification needed] The main thrust of the effort was convening and encouraging community dialogue throughout the country. The committee developed dialogue guidelines designed to help communities discuss how to heal racial and ethnic divisions wherever they exist." - Wikipedia
Among the most powerful antidotes to racism is accepting that – regardless of our skin color – we’re each influenced by unconscious racist tendencies.
The good thing is that, far from being a statement of self-blame, “I am a racist” is actually a powerful learning stance. From this position we can uncover our assumptions about race in ways that would remain invisible if we assumed that we are free of racist behaviors. Only when we are willing to admit to our own racism, can we examine and correct those unconscious behaviors that are not aligned with our desires to create a just and equitable society.

Participating in a dialogue where everyone is willing to acknowledge and own their racist assumptions, conditioning, tendencies and behaviors is likely to produce radically different outcomes than a dialogue where only some people acknowledge themselves as racists.  If you are having trouble thinking of yourself as racist, perhaps taking the Harvard Implicit Association Test will give you some insight.

The Implicit-Association Test (IAT)
If you’re having a hard time accepting the premise that you are consciously or unconsciously racist, it’s possible that taking the Harvard Implicit Association test will provide you with some surprising insights about your unconscious assumptions about race and racism. Learn more at Harvard University's Project Implicit website and in the following section:
"The implicit-association test (IAT) is a measure within social psychology designed to detect the strength of a person's automatic association between mental representations of objects (concepts) in memory. The IAT was introduced in the scientific literature in 1998 by Anthony Greenwald, Debbie McGhee, and Jordan Schwartz." - Wikipedia
The Psychology of Blink: Understanding How Our Minds Work Unconsciously - Part 1 of 2 with Dr. Anthony Greenwald (right)
From theUniversity of Washington YouTube channel: "Recent psychological research has revealed widely held unconscious thought patterns that most people would rather not possess. Dr. Anthony Greenwald, psychology professor at the University of Washington, describes his research developing the method (described in Malcolm Gladwell's, Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking) that reveals this unconscious mental content, demonstrates the method and describes how the unconscious mental content that it reveals affects our behavior."
The IAT measures the strength of associations between concepts (e.g., black people, gay people) and evaluations (e.g., good, bad) or stereotypes (e.g., athletic, clumsy). ~ Project Implicit
SeattlePI article: Doctors treated black patients worse in University of Washington study. Most doctors prefer whites to blacks in test available to the public
Picture
From the article: "This is a composite of images shown on the Implicit Association Test for racial bias, which asks test-takers to associate words with rapidly flashing images. It is part of the Project Implicit online lab, which was created by three professors, including University of Washington professor Tony Greenwald." 

2. Set a context of "listening as action" and make the dialogue an advice-free zone.
Racism’s power is fueled by hatred, ignorance, mistrust and fear. But all of those things wither in the face of love, compassion and forgiveness. A potent way to defang the demon of racism is to simply listen to the stories of how racism has affected the teller without acting on any urge to fix the story or the person sharing it.

Likewise, it is critical when listening to how racism has affected someone to refrain from giving any type of advice – the chances are quite high that your well-meaning words will not be received in the manner that you hope them to be. A simple "Thank you.", perhaps modified by something along the lines of “That must have been really hard for you.”,  will go much further than any advice you might feel compelled to share.
3. Dwell in the not knowing and practice non-attachment.
Most folks would love to solve the problem of racism. To concoct a successful plan of action to rid the human race of its scourge would be worth a dozen Nobel Peace Prizes. But racism is not a problem to be solved. It’s a vast sticky mess with tendrils that reach deep into the tenderest places - the human heart and soul. Racism defies easy answers and makes paving stones out of good intentions - and we all know upon which road those paving stones can be found! 
A dialogue on racism is the perfect practice field for dwelling in not knowing because what we don’t know about racism dwarfs what we do know about it. It’s a practice field for listening carefully, looking deeply, sitting quietly, and waiting for something to become clear before taking any action. 

Let’s underline that last point: waiting for clarity and resisting the rush to action that so often wells up inside of us when we are confronted by uncomfortable issues is a critical part of acting intelligently and it’s grossly under practiced. Conversations about racism offer us a practice field for developing the kind of patience and thoughtful care required to deal effectively with the enormity of the many interlocking messes that we find ourselves confronted with.
To be successful, any conversation on race needs to begin by staking out common ground, because without establishing a measure of shared meaning the path to a mutually desired future state is impossible to tread. Starting from the premise that each of us is a racist (to some degree or other) opens up a large expanse of common ground.

That common ground can then be fruitfully explored by examining the many ways that racism wounds us both individually and collectively, touching each of us to a greater or lesser degree. 
Additional thought: Borrow from Open Space Technology here, and assume that if you convene a dialogue where participants agree to the above premise as a starting point, then you can trust that whoever shows up are the right people - even if there are only two of you.

Wounding Racism Polarizes People in COmmunity


It can be useful to recognize that racism wounds each of us in at least three direct ways:

1.) Racism wounds us when we are its target.

2.) Racism wounds us when we target others.

3.) Racism wounds us when we witness it in action.

This framing allows us to see that virtually everyone has experienced the effects of racism at some point in their lives. 
With the above assumptions as starting points - that each of us is racist to some degree - that racism has impacted each one of us - that no one escapes racism's corrosive effects - a different approach to talking about race might be opened up, an approach that offers the promise of cleansing and healing the poisoned wounds that we suffer individually and collectively as a result of racism - conscious and unconscious, overt and covert, institutional and individual.

Three Approaches to Framing a Conversation on Race


Here are three approaches to framing a conversation on race based on what's outlined above. If you try these out, I’d recommend you have people work in dyads, triads or quartets - larger groupings of people make it harder to listen deeply to the speaker and may make people feel uncomfortable about sharing their personal experiences of such a sensitive topic.

The questions framed below are designed to allow people to start where they are with the people closest to them – no special training, facilitation or set up is required. They’ll work just as well if everyone in the conversation shares the same racial background, as they will if the participants all come from different racial backgrounds. They’ll also work as starting point for a more coordinated effort should a community organization wish to invite their members into the conversation.
Choose one of the sets of questions below and then take the questions in order, allowing each person to answer the first one before moving on to the second. Pause often to allow time for people’s stories to sink in. Remember to breathe!
A First Possible Approach
  • How has racism wounded you?
  • How has racism made you stronger?
  • What is a forgiveness you are withholding due to racism?
  • How are you generating and sharing compassion?
A Second Possible Approach
  • How has racism wounded you?
  • How have you healed those wounds?
  • What is the healing you bring to others suffering from racist wounds?
  • What forgiveness lies between you and your desired relationship with racism?
A Third Possible Approach
  • Tell a story from a time when you first felt the impact of racism in your life.
  • Tell a story from a much more recent time when you felt the impact of racism in your life.
  • What has changed for you in the interval between these times?
  • What arises for you in reflecting on this?

Parts of this post are drawn from the book, Things Racial, by Barbara Waugh and Stacy Cusulos. You can find more info here:
  • http://www.thingsracial.com/Resources.html
The same day that I completed working on this post, I read an eloquent post entitled “Which Side of History Are You On?” by Jess Rimington. She writes compellingly that we are still in the era of Civil Rights with much more work to be done. If you found this post useful, you’ll likely find great value in hers as well:
  • https://medium.com/@jess_rimington/what-side-of-history-are-you-on-83ac8dc4d334
Good luck in your efforts. 
May your conversations be fierce, yet kind-hearted. ~ Ken Homer, Collaborative Conversations

Author Ken Homer is the founder of Collaborative Conversations: Include More Voices - Make Better Choices. 
Ken Homer helps organizations leverage collaborative conversations to access awareness and insight for 21st century business transformation and enlightenment.  Learn more about Ken at his Author Page here.
Watch Conversational Shared Meaning by Ken Homer with  at the I-Open civic wisdom library on Vimeo. 
  • Add your comments, Likes and Shares
  • Embed the video in your website or blog
  • Leave a gratuity in the Tip Jar
Read the transcription, "Conversational Shared Meaning" by Ken Homer in the I-Open library on Scribd below.

Ken Homer Interview 06-19-2010 Conversational Shared Meaning by Institute for Open Economic Networks (I-Open)


Support I-Open
Ensure education, economic and workforce development services such as knowledge sharing, communications and engagement for a network of community and economic developers. Send your donation to I-Open by clicking on the secure PayPal donate button below.

2 Comments
Abrafo Kwaku Amoa (gov issue name L.Carlisle Woods RN M.D.MetD1) link
9/15/2014 07:14:10

I admire your direction but have challenges with your methods. I have just a small bit of frustration with another white person telling the country how to approach a problem-they, (european caucasians), have initiated and continue to this day. I also have some issue with your statement that, "we all are racist". I would like to ammend that to state that, 'all who speak english as their primary means of communication-are racist'. Refer back to statements made initially by Ossie Davis regarding the color bias and racism inherent in the language. After explaining that all words in the english language, (324 of them), that are synonyms for white have positive, enhancincing definitions while almost all synonyms for black, (234 of them), are negative, derogatory, and defamitory; he states, "The means by which I earn my living, (the english language), teaches me to hate myself".
This is one of virtually hundreds of truths that, for the most part, europeans are completely ignorant of but are well known and documented by othert races. Before you feel that I am a racist let me asure you that I am. Though taught Latin, Spanish, Tugalog, Iliganong, Korean, and a bit of Japanese, (I left the USA as a teenager to live in southeast Asia until I was 22yo), I was still influenced by the cultural and psychological slant of the english that shaped my view of the world and my place in it.
I would suggest in any discussion about race, there are certain priori understandings that serve as both supporting framework and psycho/social truths. 1.) Racism as practiced today is basically a eurocentric attempt to avoid the truth of history, anthropology, and the consequences of their actions. 2.) It is primarily practiced by those in power and those who wish to be in power. 3.) It is used as a reason dominate or at least minimize the complaints and views of segments that have been exploited.
Get back to me when you have had a chance to explore my website which offers an alternative to the eurocentric view of humanity and a suggestion for developement of the next phase in the evolution of mankind. You may also want to visit voiceitradio.com on Wednesdays @ 6:00PM for my internet radio show, (it was rated number 25 in the world). May The Most High bless you and the Ancestors protect you.
P.E.A.C.E.*(Proper Education Always Corrects Error)

Reply
Ken Homer link
9/19/2014 17:40:14

Thank you for taking the time to write and express your views. I appreciate your admiration for my direction even if you take exception to my methods.

It was clear to me when writing this post that there would be people who would find aspects of it challenging - most particularly the starting premise.

Regarding your frustration with "another white person telling the country how to approach a problem that they (European-caucasians) have initiated..." I am not speaking to the country. I am speaking to a self-selected group – those who are interested in participating in a dialogue on how racism wounds everyone but who are looking for suggestions on how to begin. I am not so arrogant as to believe I have "The Answer" to racism, nor do I expect that everyone will agree with my suggestions. In fact, I hope that people will read this and write back with even more effective suggestions!

I'll have to respectfully disagree with your proposed amendment to the premise "that we are all racist - at least unconsciously so" - "to all who speak English as their primary means of communication are racist." While this clearly appears as "true" to you – and no doubt there are many who share your perspective – I don't believe that adopting it as a starting premise would create the conditions where people can engage in a fruitful dialogue leading to a future different from the past, i.e,. one where the harm that racism inflicts on people is reduced from what it is today.

When designing conversations around highly charged topics, I find it's fruitful to steer clear of "truths" - which are highly subjective and tend to be divisive. Instead, the practices of focusing on defining the outcomes people desire, creating agreements about how we wish to treat each other when discussing charged topics where difficult emotions are present, and sticking with what experience has shown to be effective in helping us get to where we ultimately want to go are the tools of my trade. For me that means abandoning the practice of blame, no matter how justified it may seem. This is not a path that appeals to everyone, nor should it.

In my experience, starting the conversation from the premise that we are all racist - at least unconsciously - levels the playing field a bit and helps to avoid dragging an "us vs. them" dynamic into the dialogue. Again, speaking strictly from my experience, once us vs. them takes root in a conversation there's a nearly irresistible pull to assign blame. I have never found blaming to be something that supports a deeper understanding between people or something that allows healing of any kind to emerge. Have you?

Ossie Davis' points on language offer a stellar example of why people tend to be at least unconsciously racist. It is an unfortunate fact that the English words associated with white and black have racial bias built into them. But to address the issue of how to work with that dynamic in a blog post is quite beyond my ken. I will leave it to those who are better qualified.

Thank you again for your comments.

Peace to you, too...

Reply



Leave a Reply.


    BLOG

    The I-Open blog publishes member topics, issues and point of view in technology-based community and economic development. We hope the articles here inspire and inform your success as a leader and collaborator.

    Picture

    Editor & Publisher



    Who Is I-Open?

    The Institute for Open Economic Networks (I-Open) is an educational initiative developing and deploying new practices and tools in Open Source Economic Development.
    We invest in five areas of the Innovation Framework: Brainpower, Innovation & Entrepreneurial Networks, Quality, Connected Places, Dialogue & Inclusion, and Branding Stories.
    Strategic activities focus on research, networks, enterprise and education in open economic networks.

    Support I-Open

    Ensure education, economic and workforce development services for a community of developers. Send your donation to I-Open by clicking on the donate button below.

    Interested in submitting an article to the I-Open Blog? Click the button below for detailed information!
    Got a question or comment? Send us an . We'd love to hear from you!
    Submit Article

    Follow Us On Twitter


    Archives

    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014

    Categories

    All
    Abundance
    Arts Education
    Brainpower
    Brainstorming
    Bruce Waltuck
    Careers
    Cavana Faithwalker
    Change
    Cities
    Civic Engagement
    Civic Enterprise
    Civic Insights
    Cleveland Colectivo
    Collaboration
    Community
    Complexity
    Contemplative Sciences
    Conversation
    Creativity
    Culture
    Daniel Bassill
    Dennis Coughlin
    Disruption
    Education
    Emotional Intelligence
    Energy
    Entrepreneurship
    Facilitation
    Giving Circles
    Gloria Ferris
    Graphic Facilitation
    Holonomics
    How To
    Innovation
    Ken Homer
    Knowing
    Leadership
    Listening
    Mindfulness
    Moods
    Networks
    Nicole McGee
    Ohio
    Organization
    Pop-Up Shop
    Projects
    Race
    Reiki
    Sensemaking
    Sharing
    Social Behaviors
    Social Venture Capital
    Solutions
    Steve Banhegyi
    Survey
    Systems
    Technology
    Tom Romito
    Transformation
    Tutor/Mentor
    Volunteerism
    Workforce Development

    RSS Feed
    © 2005-2014  I-Open. 
    Content posted by I-Open users is dedicated to the public domain.
INSTITUTE FOR OPEN ECONOMIC NETWORKS (I-OPEN)

HOME
OSED
CONNECT
ENGAGE
SHOP
LOG IN
LEGAL
Connect. Engage. Innovate. © 2005-2015 Institute for Open Economic Networks (I-Open), 2563 Kingston Road, Cleveland Heights, Ohio 44118  USA Email:
Content posted by I-Open users is dedicated to the public domain.
Site Design:
Betsey Merkel
Photograpahy:
Alice Merkel
✕